Sort Your Evidence. Answer Your EQ + Outline. Today: get it organized, look hard at it, and put it into words — on paper, then out loud.
Move everything from the last three sub days — Dig Log, Source Log, Sort-Your-Evidence, your EQ + Outline — into your shared Drive folder. This is where your work lives now. Not in it? It doesn't exist yet.
Read your own Dig Log, your sources, and Tuesday's EQ answer. Where did you actually land? What's strong — what's still missing?
"When an institution fails the people it's supposed to serve — what does it take to fix it, and who has to do the work?"
Two paragraphs. The Jungle, your sources, your angle.
Names your angle by name — not "the Progressive Era," but your actual angle
Gives a real answer to the EQ — a claim, not a summary of The Jungle
Uses at least one specific piece of evidence — a scene, a quote, a law (the 1906 Acts)
Explains why that evidence proves your claim — the so-what
Sounds like you. Free write means voice over polish.
Bring your free write. We're arguing this out loud — build on each other, push back on the idea, back it with your source.
One sentence, going around: when the system failed, what did it actually take to fix it?
Whose answer just now is closest to yours — and whose is the strongest challenge to it?
People only caring once it hits them, the human cost of who didn't survive, money vs. protecting people — which of those is doing the most work in your own argument?
Where do we see a "Jungle"-style failure today — ignored until public pressure forced a fix?
One line: what you landed on today, and your flag for tomorrow. Write down one idea from the seminar you want to steal for your draft.